At a glance
- The operating climate has shifted to a NAVI profile: nonlinear, accelerated, volatile, and interconnected.
- A majority of organizations acknowledge the need to reinvent risk management, yet only a small minority have fully done so.
- A distinct cohort—Risk Strategists—fuse risk and strategy, encounter fewer surprises, and respond faster with measurable business gains.
Why the old playbook fails in the NAVI world
A wave of rapid, compounding disruptions—AI leaps, geopolitical shocks, supply bottlenecks, energy swings, extreme weather—has redefined enterprise exposure. Risks no longer arrive as isolated incidents; they cascade across functions and markets, creating tipping points and unexpected outcomes. In this context, traditional risk management—periodic, siloed, and compliance-centric—cannot provide the sensing speed or response agility that today’s environment demands.
NAVI characteristics defined
- Nonlinear: abrupt shifts and threshold effects that invalidate straight-line forecasting.
- Accelerated: detection and action must compress from months to days or hours.
- Volatile: frequent directional swings challenge operating plans and capital allocation.
- Interconnected: cross-domain spillovers amplify second- and third-order consequences.
Mentions of these NAVI dynamics in public corporate disclosures have surged and remain elevated, underscoring that this is a structural change, not a transient anomaly.
Strategic implication: success requires dual reinvention—a strategy process informed by risk realities, and a risk function aligned to strategic objectives. Organizations that hard-wire this two-way linkage outperform.
A new posture: from compliance to competitive capacity
Some companies appear to “absorb the shock” better: they encounter far fewer surprise events, detect incidents earlier, and mobilize responses faster. This is not due to luck or safer markets. It reflects a different philosophy of risk—treating it as a capacity that enables bolder, better-timed decisions rather than a perimeter check.
Core shift: risk is moved from the back office to the center of planning, investment, and execution. This integration is the hallmark of the Risk Strategist approach endorsed by Bespoke Business Development.
Two mindsets in the data: Risk Strategists vs. Risk Traditionalists
A global survey of 1,200 risk leaders reveals a persistent split:
- Risk Traditionalists: emphasize control and regulatory adherence, operate through fragmented processes, refresh risk views infrequently, and measure success as the absence of incidents.
- Risk Strategists: embed risk into strategic choices, reshape operating models, adopt fit-for-NAVI methods, and measure value through decision quality, resilience, and growth.
Transformation progress
- 58% of Strategists have moderately or completely revamped their approach since the pandemic (vs. 36% of Traditionalists).
- 20% of Strategists report a complete overhaul (vs. 7% of Traditionalists).
Performance differentials
Strategists lead most in metrics that matter under NAVI:
- Lower share of “unexpected” risk events.
- Clearer ownership and accountability across risk types.
- Faster incident identification and shorter response cycles.
Traditionalists perform comparatively closer only on cost and compliance, reinforcing a worldview where risk remains a cost center rather than a creator of strategic advantage.
What holds Traditionalists back
Mindset inertia. Risk functions often attract conservative profiles; consensus and precedent dominate. Many Traditionalist organizations do not fully recognize the innovation gap within their own teams, limiting adoption of newer, NAVI-relevant methods.
Structural fragmentation. Siloed ownership prevents a unified view of exposure. In many Traditionalist firms, the chief risk officer lacks parity with other C-suite roles, and risk categories do not have explicit owners accountable for outcomes.
Value articulation. It is difficult to quantify avoided losses and long-horizon mitigations. When value is framed only as reduced premiums or fewer regulatory penalties, underinvestment is rationalized—even when strategic benefits (steadier cash flows, higher M&A completion rates, faster time-to-market) are material but under-measured.
Result: a negative feedback loop—limited investment → dated methods → limited impact → continued under-resourcing. Breaking the loop requires reframing risk as a growth enabler with clear, decision-linked metrics.
Building a Risk Strategist organization: principles and practice
Bespoke Business Development recommends orienting risk transformation around four mutually reinforcing principles.
1) Business-focused (value-driven)
Risk exists to advance strategy and growth, not merely to comply. Because regulation codifies yesterday’s crises, compliance can only ever be a lagging indicator. Strategy-aligned risk clarifies where to take calculated bets—entering markets, executing M&A, funding innovation—while protecting downside.
Signals you’re business-focused
- Risk reviews anchor to strategic priorities and value drivers.
- Portfolio choices (markets, products, partners) are guided by codified risk appetite.
- Risk leaders are embedded in capital planning, pricing, supply, and technology roadmaps.
2) Aligned (enterprise-wide coherence)
Create a shared language and end-to-end view: cross-functional risk councils, unified taxonomies, and risk appetite frameworks tied to performance metrics. Alignment accelerates decisions and makes trade-offs explicit.
What alignment looks like
- Every key risk has a clearly accountable owner and escalation path.
- Risk appetite thresholds map to strategy (e.g., earnings volatility, liquidity buffers, geopolitical exposure limits).
- Risk and strategy teams co-own dashboards and planning cadences.
3) Nimble & curious (faster cycles, broader lens)
Move from quarterly snapshots to continuous sensing and rapid iteration. Use scenario planning to explore branching futures, identify tripwires, and pre-wire playbooks. Encourage dissent and “red team” critiques to challenge base cases.
Practical markers
- Horizon scans run continuously and feed decision forums on a fixed rhythm.
- Scenario exercises and tabletops rehearse cross-functional response roles.
- Curiosity extends beyond geopolitics to tech, climate, demographics, and rates.
4) Technology-enabled (from detection to decision)
AI and advanced analytics amplify risk capabilities—ingesting unstructured data, flagging weak signals, generating scenarios, and quantifying interdependencies. Even if investment is staged, data readiness, model governance, and skills should be prepared now.
Early wins
- Risk signals embedded into business-owned dashboards and OKR reviews.
- LLM-assisted scenario drafting compresses weeks of manual work into hours.
- Control automation and continuous monitoring reduce detection and response times.
Methods that fit the moment: a NAVI-aligned toolkit
Risk Strategists employ a portfolio rather than a single silver bullet. Four method families stand out:
A) Foundational hard-wiring
- Enterprise/Integrated Risk Management (ERM/IRM)
- Risk appetite frameworks with board-approved limits and guardrails
- Dynamic risk registers linked to performance dashboards
- Assurance mapping to clarify control coverage and gaps
B) Scanning & early warning
- Structured horizon scanning with curated external and internal sources
- Sentiment and narrative tracking across media, policy, and markets
- Continuous risk monitoring with threshold alerts tied to decision rights
C) Scenario planning & resilience testing
- Multi-path scenario planning with quantified impacts and playbooks
- Monte Carlo and distribution-aware modeling for nonlinearity
- Stress tests, tabletop exercises, war-gaming, and risk velocity analysis
- “Black swan” explorations that test tail preparedness
D) Knowledge transfer from adjacent fields
- Graph analytics to map contagion and dependency networks
- Behavioral economics to anticipate organizational bias and drift
- Complexity science to understand tipping points and emergent behavior
Crucial nuance: treat these as living, decision-relevant processes. Static registers updated quarterly and filed away will not change outcomes; embedded workflows tied to investment and execution will.
From intent to impact: a pragmatic path forward
Transformation can start now, even as longer-horizon elements mature. Five near-term actions create momentum:
1) Codify a future-state vision and route map
Co-author the target model with business leaders so risk becomes strategy-informed and strategy becomes risk-aligned. Use future-back planning to identify capability gaps and sequence investments. Prioritize no-regret moves that pay off across scenarios, and decide where to buy vs. build to accelerate.
2) Catalyze culture
Set expectations from the top: intelligent risk-taking beats reflexive avoidance. Celebrate early detection and informed contrarian views—even when risks do not materialize. Senior leaders should personally participate in scenarios and stress tests to signal importance.
3) Tune incentives and metrics
Reward risk teams for business enablement (decision quality, cycle time, strategic follow-through), not just loss prevention. Embed risk-aware KPIs in business unit scorecards. Track the value of risk through:
- Reduced earnings volatility and execution slippage
- Higher M&A completion and post-deal value capture
- Improved supply reliability and working-capital resilience
- Faster response times and lower incident severities
4) Prepare for technology at scale
Identify high-ROI use cases (continuous sensing, early warning, scenario generation, control automation). Ready the data estate, model governance, and skills. Monitor platform maturity and economics so the organization can scale when signal quality and cost curves cross favorable thresholds.
5) Back the people who carry the change
Broaden the talent bench: bring in strategy operators, data scientists, scenario modelers, network analysts, and product-minded leaders. Rotate high-potential managers between risk and P&L roles. Appoint visible evangelists with mandate and influence to diffuse new practices.
Sector note: financial services
With political and macro shocks weighing on revenue and investment timing, Strategists in financial services are using risk appetite, early-warning indicators, and scenario-driven credit/market limits to maintain deal velocity and protect return on equity—treating risk as an enabler of pricier, better-timed capital rather than a brake.
What “good” looks like in practice
Governance
- Board-approved risk appetite linked to strategy and cascaded into limits and triggers.
- Named executive owners for each major risk with clear escalation paths.
Operating rhythm
- Monthly (or faster) NAVI dashboards feed investment and operating forums.
- Quarterly strategy reviews are augmented with scenario-based rehearsals.
Information architecture
- Unified taxonomies; integrated risk and performance data; lineage and controls.
- Business-owned views with drill-downs to assumptions and mitigations.
Capabilities
- Analytics teams blend risk, FP&A, data engineering, and competitive insights.
- Playbooks define response roles, communications, countermeasures, and decision rights.
The bottom line
The NAVI era rewards organizations that bind risk and strategy together. Firms that become Risk Strategists—business-focused, aligned, nimble, and technology-enabled—experience fewer surprises, move faster than competitors, and convert uncertainty into durable value. The path begins with a shared vision, visible cultural cues, incentives that reinforce desired behaviors, pragmatic technology readiness, and empowered people who can carry the change.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Bespoke Business Development. They are intended to encourage discussion and reflection, rather than serve as legal, financial, accounting, tax, or professional advice.
Have Questions or Thoughts About Our Latest Insights? We’d love to hear from you.
Whether you’re curious about a recent post, want to explore a topic further, or have ideas you’d like to share—reach out to us. Our team is here to connect, collaborate, and provide clarity.
Contact Us Today.
